Monday, March 25, 2013

The Life and Times of Job (Part 1): Revisting Job

Revisiting Job

Every so often it happens to me that I stumble across some piece of information, some minor observation, which forces me to reexamine matters I had thought settled comfortably years ago.  Particularly, when this happens with biblical scripture, the result for me is a happy period of study, familiarizing myself with this new question and scriptures long ignored.  Whether the matter concerned critical doctrines of faith, or more often details and elements surrounding the stories I grew up with, there is this welcome feeling of being lost in the hunt for something new and interesting; of exploring and adventuring; of something that inevitably brings old stories to life.

The problem for me is that the further I go back in scripture, the more so many stories take on a mythical quality.  I’m modern, they are ancient.  Different technologies, patterns of living, ways of thinking.  I work on computer networks, they herded sheep, or cattle.  I live in a townhome, they a mud-brick house or pack-up-and-go tent.  There’s a great host of disparities that stretch the need for proper biblical exposition to help us understand the environment and the times, as often a necessary context for appreciating the story.  Miracles only add to this divide because although we speak often of what God does in our lives, how he has led us, changed us, changed our circumstances – although we can see what is generally a subtle hand leading us, smoothing our paths, even healing us – it’s not the same dramatic moment in time as the miracles we read about.  We are largely a secular and modern society, wholly unaccustomed to experiencing or even admitting the possibility of divine intervention in daily life.  We are accustomed to deconstructing everything into a naturalistic model.  Magic is a slew of simple tricks, elaborately staged.  Angels and demons seem to exist as peripheral, in concept only, but are not part of real life.  This is the impact of modernism and naturalism: that we are by nature skeptical of (and alienated from) everything that does not have an immediate natural explanation.

As Christians, trying to stay biblically based, we run into stories that read as myths to us.  The difference between those like me who believe in a biblical inerrancy of scripture, and those who don't, is that when we read about the parting of the Red Sea (for example), we don’t believe it is simply metaphor or analogy, but somehow it did happen.  But we have no idea what this looked like.  It is so far disconnected from our reality that we simply stumble on the details as written, put up some (any) picture of this in our mind, and automatically move on to the parts we can understand.  Others will spend years of their life studying the events, the details, in the hope of digging out more pieces of the puzzle to make it seem less other-worldly.

It is here where questions about the scriptures are due, are necessary.  Not so much about inerrancy itself – we assume it happened – but where our mind just wants to accept a myth and move on, to instead question: what in heaven happened?

My latest bone to chew on, like Bentley at home, gnawing obsessively as the world around him fades, starts in the Book of Job.  What in heaven happened to poor Job?  A question that I haven’t asked since I first heard about him over 20 years ago.  Why?  Because I knew it was a story about Godly patience, and fortitude, and living righteously despite all; an example for me.  And so, even if I would strongly claim as fact that it must be real because it is in scripture, nonetheless it seemed no more real than some children’s stories.  You take the lesson and move on.

So what happened to Job?  And for some clues, I owe something to a handful of people out there who noticed some of the oddities in the book and instead of moving on, sat on this verse or that and asked “what happened?”  Particularly, a gentleman named Barry Setterfield (known to me for pointing out things very much against the grain of common thought but nonetheless interesting) lit the first of several sparks.  Perhaps it is time to treat Job as a historical account, rather than simply a story of moral weight.

No comments:

Post a Comment